rs's blog
new world economy
Peter F. Drucker says
"Furthermore, most multinationals are not big. Rather, they are mostly small- to medium-sized enterprises. Typical perhaps is a German manufacturer of specialized surgical instruments who, with $20 million in sales and with plants in eleven countries, has around 60 percent of the world market in the field. And only a fraction of multinationals are manufacturers. Banks are probably the largest single group of multinationals, followed by insurance companies such as Germany's Allianz, financial-services institutions such as GE Finance Corporation and Merrill Lynch, wholesale distributors (especially in pharmaceuticals), and retailers like Japan's Ito Yokado."
How have these companies become multinational?
State of MBA education
An Academic, PhilipGreenspun, recently wrote this in his blog:
"When universities created business schools in the 20th Century traditional academics decried the collapse of standards. Instead of students studying Literature, Art, History, and Science they would be going through the motions of a scholar while occupying their minds with things that formerly had been learned at a desk as an apprentice in a dreary Victorian counting house."
Is the same thing true in today's world? Is the standard of education in these institutions still something that can be learnt at a "Victorian counting house"?
My guess is that it is not so. In the last few decades many new forms of markets have evolved and at the same time many new products and services have come up. Without a systematic study of this phenomena it is not possible to increase the efficiency of running today's businesses.
Changing face of entertainment industry?
Is the MBA responsible for moral turpitude at the top?
Interesting opinion in the economist
Business schools are not responsible for unethical behaviour of their old students.
"The dubious claim that business schools are responsible for the moral failures of their graduates decades after graduation does, however, highlight one widespread misunderstanding about the role and purpose of an MBA."
Is economics to be blamed?
"Sumantra Ghoshal, a respected business academic who died last year,... (and other respected academics, such as Jeffrey Pfeffer of Stanford, are carrying his argument forward), is because management studies have been hi-jacked intellectually by the dismal science of economics."
MBA = Business Leaders?
"a good MBA degree can help provide a student with analytical skills and theoretical knowledge useful to a business career. But becoming a successful leader of men and women in a turbulent business world
requires maturity and wisdom."
Sadly maturity and wisdom cannot be taught in any academic program. We can only ensure that mature and wise students join business schools by using appropriate testing techniques.
Google's scholarly pursuits
I wonder why Google took so much time to come up with this kind of service. Read more about it at google's blog. It will be interesting to watch impact of this service on research/publication/tenure in academic circles.
Study the timeline, google first came up with a search tool for different languages, then image search,and after that "froogle" and then after something like nine years since their inception they have come up with "scholar".
It is quite possible that when Sergey Brin and Larry Page decided to build "google" then they could have thought of doing it for reducing their literature review workload (part of doing a phd). During the process of building up this company they must have forgotten about this (as so often happens with most of the phd scholars, they do everything else but their phd). This tool (scholar) will be of great help to researchers all around the world.
